Myanmar: Storm - IRIN: 25-Jul-08
IRIN
MYANMAR: Access is there, donors should respond generously, says Holmes
25 July 2008
YANGON, 25 July 2008 (IRIN) - Following a three-day mission to Myanmar,
the UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency
Relief Coordinator John Holmes says he hopes for stronger donor response
in the wake of the Post Nargis Joint Assessment Report (PONJA) report
released in Singapore on 22 July.
"There's every reason for the donors to now respond generously," he told
IRIN in Yangon.
Nearly 140,000 people were killed or left missing after Cyclone Nargis
hit the Ayeyarwady Delta on 2 and 3 May, affecting some 2.4 million
people.
Q: Almost three months since Cyclone Nargis struck the country, where
are we now in the relief and recovery effort?
A: The relief effort will need to go on for another six to nine months
because people still need a supply of food until they can feed
themselves. They need further help with water and sanitation and shelter
and there is a continuing need obviously for medical help too and
monitoring to make sure there are no disease outbreaks. Together with
that, we need to be conducting early recovery activities. Things like
agriculture to make sure the farmers can plant and they have the seeds
and fertilisers and the ability to plough. The fishermen will need boats
and nets and so on to restart their activities. There is a whole range
of activity there under the humanitarian label which we need to continue
for some months to come.
Q: As of today, the Myanmar flash appeal for victims of the disaster has
been covered by just 40 percent. Why the shortfall?
A: The initial appeal was for US$201 million and we have just about $200
million now. We issued a revised appeal two weeks ago for $480 million.
We've already had some good news. The British have produced some more
money. Australia announced an extra $30 million two days ago. Other
donors I have spoken to are looking positively on helping more. I'm
reasonably confident that we will get more resources. I don't know if we
will get the whole $480 million. It's very unusual to get everything you
appeal for but what the donors wanted when we first had the pledging
conference in Yangon on 25 May was access for international relief
workers to the delta and a proper assessment of needs. Access is there.
International aid workers are working in the delta in a reasonably
normal way and we now have the Post-Nargis Joint Assessment of both the
relief needs and of course the longer-term recovery and reconstruction
needs. There's every reason for the donors to now respond generously.
Q: What steps need to be taken to address that?
A: I have been talking to the donors both publicly and privately. I have
encouraged them to think that any concerns they may have had about
access, monitoring, the basis of the needs, have been met and dealt
with. Therefore, this is now a normal international relief operation
where the needs of the people are still great and [will be] for some
time to come. There's every reason to respond generously. That's the
conversation we've been having and I'm reasonably confident we can
generate a good proportion of the resources we now need, as long as the
cooperation with the government goes on as constructively as it has in
the past two months.
Q: Initially, access for aid workers to the delta was largely
restricted. How would you describe the situation now with the government
in terms of cooperation?
A: I think the situation now is much better than two months ago. There
are hundreds of international relief workers working in the delta now
from NGOs and UN agencies. There are no problems getting visas. You
still have to get permission from the government to travel to the
affected area and that sometimes takes a few days and there can be
bureaucratic hiccups with that. It's not absolutely perfect. It's not as
easy as we would like. But essentially the access is there. The
important thing is that that access should remain there for the
remaining period of the response.
Q: Are you confident that access will continue?
A: I am reasonably confident. There is no reason to suppose it will
change now. But that's one of the reasons I wanted to come here, to
discuss with the government the need to maintain that. I think the
tripartite coordination mechanism, involving ASEAN [Association of
Southeast Asian Nations], as well as the UN and the government, has been
very effective in resolving problems.
There have been problems and there will be problems no doubt in the
future. But we have been able to discuss them frankly and resolve them.
That's very good. We need to continue doing that. The tripartite core
group is going to continue its work I think for at least another year.
That's what the ASEAN foreign ministers decided in Singapore. That was a
very welcome decision from our point of view. So there is every reason
to suppose that this kind of flexibility and access will continue.
Q: How important is ASEAN in the overall effort?
A: I think the role of ASEAN has been to provide a bridge if you like
between the Myanmar government and the international community more
widely. They have provided a level of comfort to both sides. I think the
role of ASEAN has been very positive, very important. We're very glad
that it is going to continue for another year and we will want to go on
working with ASEAN in the humanitarian area in other ways as well, maybe
through other disasters. I think it has been a unique cooperation
between the UN and a regional organisation for a natural disaster. There
are lessons we can apply to other areas of the world as well.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Appropriate Donations for International Disaster/Humanitarian Needs
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Center for International web: www.cidi.org
. Disaster Information listserv: www.cidi.org/listsub.htm
. guidelines: www.cidi.org/donate.htm
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Myanmar: Cyclone Nargis www.cidi.org/incident/myanmar-08e