Sudan - ACT: 12-Aug-02
Action by Churches Together (ACT)
Appeal - Sudan - Southern Blue Nile
Kurmuk - Assistance to IDPs & Host Community - AFSD-23
Appeal Target: US$ 118,720
Balance Requested from ACT Network: US$ 111,880
Geneva, 12 August 2002
Twelve thousand internally displaced people (IDPs) in Kurmuk county in
South Blue Nile, Southern Sudan are in desperate need of food. This is
due to the current severe hunger brought about by a combination of factors
such as the ongoing war between the Sudan government and the SPLA, and the
successive dry season offensives in each of the last four years. The
Southern Blue Nile Region is a hotly contested area and has changed hands
between the Government of Sudan and the SPLA on several occasions during
the last 19 years of the Sudan civil war. The area is strategically
important for both the SPLA and the GoS because of its proximity to the
Damazin hydroelectric scheme to the north and the Khor Adar Oilfields to
the west. Extensive gold deposits also make it potentially rich in other
respects.
In late May of this year, the GoS launched an offensive on the town of
Geizan and its surroundings and in June 2002 it dropped 16 bombs in Yabus
village where the CEAS has an office compound which was narrowly missed by
one of the bombs. This led to a displacement of thousands of people in the
surrounding areas. Apart from desperation for food, non food items and
medical care, there is also need for seeds and tools, as well as water in
order to guarantee the longer term well-being of the IDPs and host
communities. It must be stated that the IDPs are not living in camps, but
interspersed with local population for security reasons.
ACT member Church Ecumenical Action in Sudan (CEAS) proposes to respond to
the needs of the affected people through the provision of food for a
three-month period, and will also distribute sorghum seeds and tools. The
area of the proposed intervention is predominantly a Muslim area where the
Sudanese Church is weak. CEAS therefore works in partnership with a local
NGO called Relief Organisation of Fazugli (ROOF) which has been working in
partnership with CEAS since 1999. Currently, CEAS and ROOF collaborate in
the implementation of a number of development activities including food
security, education, water and women's activities.
Project Completion Date: 31 October 2002
Summary of Appeal Targets, Pledges/Contributions Received and Balance
Requested
US$
Total Appeal Target(s) 118,720
Less: Pledges/Contr. Recd. 6,840
Balance Requested from ACT Network 111,880
Ms. Geneviève Jacques Thor-Arne Prois Robert Granke
Director Director, ACT Director
WCC/Cluster on Relations LWF/World Service
REQUESTING ACT MEMBER INFORMATION
Church Ecumenical Action in Sudan (CEAS)
IMPLEMENTING ACT MEMBER & PARTNER INFORMATION
Church Ecumenical Action in Sudan (CEAS) was formed in 1996 and is an
ecumenical consortium made up of three international Christian networks
(Caritas Internationalis, Lutheran World Federation and World Council of
Churches) and the two Sudanese Church Councils (Sudan Council of Churches
and the New Sudan Council of Churches). By Virtue of its mandate and
composition, CEAS always works in partnership with other organisations,
both local and international. These include generalised church development
agencies, individual church dioceses, international faith-based NGOs and
Sudanese indigenous NGOs (SINGOs).
In the intervention presented here, CEAS' partners will comprise:
The Relief Organisation of Fazugli (ROOF): The area of the proposed
intervention (Southern Blue Nile Region, Sudan) is a predominantly Muslim
area where the Sudanese church is weak. ROOF is an indigenous NGO that has
been working in partnership with CEAS since 1999. CEAS and ROOF currently
collaborate in the implementation of a number of development activities
including food security, education, water and women's activities. In
addition, since 2001 ROOF has been attempting to develop an emergency
preparedness capacity. ROOF has been instrumental in securing part of the
funding (through its own appeal) for humanitarian assistance for this
area.
Sudan Relief and Rehabilitation Association (SRRA): is the humanitarian
wing of the SPLA, which is thus, mandated to co-ordinate the relief,
rehabilitation and development activities of organisations working in the
area.
GOAL: Is an Irish NGO that has been active in Southern Blue Nile since
September 2000 in the field of Primary Health Care. For purposes of this
project, GOAL has released displaced persons kits for two thousand
families and is providing primary health care services.
Samaritan's Purse: Started working in Southern Blue Nile in February 2002,
primarily in the health sector. Samaritan's Purse has agreed to locally
purchase 20 tonnes of sorghum to meet the immediate food needs of the
displaced population.
The SBN Regional Authorities: Southern Blue Nile is one of the five
disputed regions that make up the area controlled by the Sudan People's
Liberation Army (SPLA). Located outside or beyond the historical boundary
of southern Sudan, the area is administered by a regional authority headed
by the Regional Secretary or Governor. Consistent with its capacity
building mandate CEAS has, for the past year, been assisting the office of
the Governor to establish key departments such as health, education and
food security. In this context the local authorities have been involved in
conducting assessments and constitute a critical element in the emergency
co-ordination team, providing local knowledge, access and security. They
have also donated 5 tonnes of sorghum to the IDPs at the onset of the
emergency.
DESCRIPTION of the EMERGENCY SITUATION
Background
Southern Blue Nile region is bordered by the Ethiopian frontier to the
east, Upper Nile Region of southern Sudan to the south and west and by the
Ingessena Hills in the northwest. The Blue Nile River also forms one of
the boundaries of the region, flowing in a northwesterly direction from
the Ethiopian border.
There are two counties in Southern Blue Nile either wholly or partially
under the control of the rebel SPLA: Kurmuk County comprising four payams
and Geizan County with five payams1 The local government system introduced
by the SPLM consists of five administrative tiers or levels. These are (in
ascending order) "boma" or village; "payam" or sub-county; "county";
"region" and "national".
1.
One county of Upper Nile Region (Mabaan) is also under the "caretaker"
administration of Southern Blue Nile.
Southern Blue Nile Region is a contested area that has changed hands
between the Government of Sudan (GoS) and the SPLA on several occasions
during the 19 years of the Sudanese civil war to date. Lying just beyond
the boundaries of the historical southern Sudan it is a strategically
important area for both SPLA and GoS because of its proximity to the
Damazin hydroelectric scheme to the north and the Khor Adar oilfields to
the west. Extensive gold deposits also make it potentially rich in other
respects.
There has been almost continuous military activity in the region since its
most recent capture by the SPLA in 1997 and this reached its peak in the
early months of 2001 and 2002 when the GoS attempted to recapture Kurmuk
and Geizan towns respectively. From 25 - 29 May 2002, the GOS launched an
offensive on the town of Geizan and its surroundings leading to the
current emergency situation (described below).
Meanwhile, 2001 witnessed the first incidents of aerial bombardment
(Geizan, Kurmuk and Yabus) in many years and the first use of surface to
surface ballistic missiles anywhere in Sudan. In June 2002, 16 bombs hit
Yabus village, one narrowly missing the CEAS compound. Luckily, no
casualties were reported.
The region has one long rainy season that runs from late April to
November, with the heaviest rains being experienced from July to
September. Most areas of the region are inaccessible during the rainy
season. However, some movement remains possible by four-wheel drive
tractor. During this time of the year a large percentage of the many
rivers that transverse the region swell and make travel difficult. The
soil is sticky black cotton. The rest of the year is dry and very hot.
CEAS commenced operations in Southern Blue Nile in 1997 with the
relatively modest aim of providing food for three months and inputs of
seeds and tools for 12,500 people around Kurmuk town. Secondary objectives
during this phase were to provide health materials for Kurmuk Hospital and
education supplies to nearby schools. In 1998 it targeted 24,000 people
with emergency food aid, seeds and tools. From 1999 to date the programme
has taken a more developmental approach in the implementation of food
security, water, health, education, women's projects and capacity building
for ROOF. However, CEAS can / will also assist in any emergency situations
that may arise.
Current Emergency Situation
In an appeal sent out by ROOF to their supporters and to organisations
working in Southern Blue Nile in June 2002, the situation arising from the
GoS capture of Geizan town is reported as having
"* culminated into a humanitarian disaster, which needs urgent emergency
intervention from the international agencies and international NGOs, to
cope with the situation and alleviate the suffering of the affected
communities".
The appeal further describes the situation as follows:
"The Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) are estimated to be round 12,000
with a large proportion of women, children and the aged.
"The displaced have lost virtually all their belongings and personal
effects. The IDPs are sheltering under trees. They urgently need tents,
plastic sheets, and mosquito nets; bearing in mind that the rainy season
has already started.
"Their stores of grains were burnt and their animals were looted and crops
were destroyed, this resulted into acute food shortages and early signs of
starvation.
"The Geizan hospital and outpost clinics were looted, i.e. drugs,
refrigerators, laboratory equipment, etc.
"Coupled with this is the plight of the oil IDPs from the Upper Nile
Region who were chased by helicopter gun ship from around the oil fields
and took refuge in SBN.
"GoS has denied UN agencies and international NGOs access to the area
under the OLS/Unicef mandate. The area is therefore, considered a 'NO Go
Zone' for agencies operating under the tripartite arrangement."
This appeal prompted a co-ordinated response to the emergency from CEAS,
GOAL, Samaritan's Purse, Safe Harbor, ROOF and the SBN local authority
representative based in Nairobi and a subsequent rapid assessment by CEAS,
GOAL and SRRA in Keli in late June 2002. This assessment revealed that
thousands of people had fled from Geizan and Bokori Payams and were
scattered around Keli in Himira, Jebel Zolak, Atala, Gilting and Birka
Delia villages.
Apart from desperation for food, non-food items and medical care, there is
also need for seeds, tools and water in order to guarantee longer-term or
future well being of the IDPs. Having arrived at the onset of the
fighting, the IDPs, spread along both sides of the border scattered along
40 kilometers of the frontline, putting them in a vulnerable position.
They fled here because of proximity to their homes, Ethiopia and security
and to get support from their relatives. Thus the IDPs are not living in a
camp situation but are interspersed with local civilians.
In addition, to the causalities arising from the recent fighting, the area
is regularly affected by problems of food insecurity. A nutrition survey
conducted by CEAS in August 2000 noted a few cases of moderate
malnutrition in Belatuma IDPs camp in the extreme south of the region.
These were treated through a programme of generalised food distribution
supported by ACT members. Because of the small number of affected
individuals, a decision was taken to curtail relief activities from 2001
onwards. However, from mid-year 2001 until the harvest season in November
/ December 2001 another low-grade famine affected the northern and eastern
payams of the region, killing a number of people and disrupting the lives
of scores of others. The latter were assisted by ROOF through a programme
of food distribution. In addition, towards the end of 2001, crop failure
was reported as a result of flooding, especially along River Yabus where a
number of IDPs from Belatuma had cultivated their crops, while a
continuing famine situation was reported in the north of the region in
Keli and Karan Karan Payams. Those involved in this instance were persons
whose livelihood had been affected by a combination of insecurity and
drought. It is the reported sudden deterioration in the condition of these
people (Belatuma IDPs and war affected persons in the northern payams)
that prompted an appeal to the ACT Secretariat for funds with which to
carry out an assessment early this year. However, the intervention
outlined in that appeal has been overtaken by the current emergency
situation and the two will now be merged to meet the full needs of the
moment.
Impact on Human Lives
"The offensive was timed with the beginning of the rainy season: a time
when people are busy with farming activities on the land. This situation
has abruptly disrupted their life sustaining activities"2 From the ROOF
appeal for humanitarian assistance of June 2002.
2
The IDPs were able to run with very few personal items and animals and the
foodstuffs they brought are depleted. It was reported that in Atala
village, where 60 newly constructed huts were counted, people were eating
wild foods and depending on the generosity of the local population. In
Atala and Birka Delia, the nearest bore holes are hours walk away and
water containers are very few. There is therefore a heavy burden on women
whose cultural roles are to look for wild foods, water and firewood in
addition to their reproductive and other productive roles.
Malaria is the highest cause of morbidity among the IDPs with 75 cases
reported during the assessment, followed by diarrhoea. Although under
"normal" circumstances these diseases are the primary cause of illness,
they are both curable with essential drugs and education.
Access to medical services in the area is generally limited with a total
of just five primary health care units serving the entire region3 A sixth
facility was located in Geizan town recently re-captured by GoS.
3:
an area measuring some 200 kilometers north to south and 100 kilometers
east to west,
In addition to the on-going war, particularly successive dry season
offensives in each of the last four years, climatic and environmental
conditions have also disrupted the lives of another 12,000 people based in
and around the IDPs camp at Belatuma. The principal problem in both
locations is shortage of food. A problem compounded by the lack of
nutritional diversity and the prevailing reliance on a narrow range of
food crops.
Regrettably, although the IDPs are clearly very vulnerable, to provide any
form of relief to them in their current location will pose huge logistical
difficulties when the rains begin.
Locations for Proposed Response
The location in which food and seeds and tools will be distributed will be
Keli. However, seeds and tools will also be distributed to the settled
population and to the displaced people from the oil fields around Yabus.
The IDPs in Belatuma will receive assistance with seed and tools under the
auspices of the regular CEAS SBN programme. The emergency committee and
local leaders will make the selection of families to be assisted, with
supervision coming from the combined NGO representatives. Distribution of
relief items will be managed by the NGOs with assistance from the civil
authorities.
CEAS maintains bases in Yabus village and Kurmuk town (the largest
population centre and administrative headquarters of the region). GOAL
also maintains facilities in these two locations while ROOF and the
regional authorities are both based in Kurmuk.
CEAS' facilities in the two locations include transport vehicles (3 4x4
Toyota Land Cruiser cars for the dry season and 2 4x4 tractors for the
rainy season), staff accommodation, radio and satellite phone
communications.
Current Security Situation
Southern Blue Nile is a remote and extremely isolated region of "New
Sudan". Because of the official closure of the Ethiopian border it is
accessible only by air via a two and a half hour flight from Lokichoggio
in north western Kenya.
Because of its strategic and symbolic importance, being an SPLA held area
of northern Sudan, i.e. located beyond the official boundaries of the
south, it is the scene of almost constant military activity. This takes
the form of regular dry season offensives, infantry skirmishes and
artillery duels near the front line and occasional aerial bombardment, as
has been the case in the current emergency situation.
However, despite the prominence of militarism in the local culture and the
somewhat tense security situation the local authorities maintain a fairly
relaxed attitude to NGOs whose activities are both facilitated and
encouraged.
GOAL & OBJECTIVES
Goal: To provide immediate humanitarian emergency food aid to alleviate
the suffering of the IDPs from Geizan and Bokori Payams who are currently
displaced in Keli Payam of Southern Blue Nile, by targeting the most
vulnerable.
Objectives:
Provide food to 12,000 IDPs for the coming 3 months.
Enhance food security and nutrition by distributing simultaneously, seeds
and tools to the IDP and local population.
To integrate the current emergency intervention with on-going CEAS
programmes, notable food security.
Co-ordination with ROOF and local authorities that will generate a "knock
on" effect in building their capacities to deal with future emergencies.
TARGETED BENEFICIARIES
The number of the newly displaced is estimated at 12,000 people, as
indicated below:
LOCATION
POPULATION
HOUSEHOLDS
FEMALES
<5 YEAR OLD
Himira
4,500
402
2,480
390
Zolak Jebel
2,057
317
1,130
200
Atala
560
111
315
70
Gilting
4,000
380
2,285
360
Birka Delalia
1,510
212
845
138
TOTAL
12,627
1,422
7,055
1,158
NB: These figures were provided to the Emergency Committee by local
leaders, as a visual head count was not possible. Numbers are reported to
be increasing and will increase further once food is available, as the
food aid will cause a pulling factor to those still in hiding in the bush.
It is estimate that 20% of the IDPs are children.
The estimated population of "old" IDPs are as follows:
Belatuma - 12,000;
Around Yabus village (particularly those displaced from the Khor Adar oil
fields in northern Upper Nile) - 500;
The population of Keli and Karan Karan Payams is about 21,000 and 20,000
respectively of which a total of 12,627 are internally displaced in Keli
and 9,230 are internally displaced in Karan Karan. It is not possible to
target all IDPs and therefore only the most vulnerable will receive aid.
The population of the area are mostly rural-based peasant farmers,
augmented by a number of miners working the extensive alluvial gold
deposits together with petty traders. As in much of the developing world a
major percentage of the population are children and youth, while, because
of the war, a large part of the rural population is made up of women and
girls.
Criteria Used in Beneficiary Selection
The Emergency Committee and local leaders at grass roots level will make
the selection of families to be assisted supervised by the NGOs.
Distribution of emergency inputs will be managed by the NGOs including
ROOF (with assistance from the civil authorities in the form of
transport).
The Local authorities have been asked by the Emergency Committee to move
the IDPs to Keli where access is easier, storage facilities are available
and two water sources are close by.
PROPOSED EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE & IMPLEMENTATION
CEAS intends to target 12, 000 people with a half, dry ration of food for
a period of 3 months. This will require the quantity of food items shown
in the table below (broken down in greater detail in the budget attached).
Grain is missing from the table because a separate appeal by ROOF for a
total of 900 tonnes of sorghum is likely to be funded by the Dutch
organisation, Novib.
Pulses 32.4 tonnes.
Oil 10.8 tonnes.
Salt 2.7 tonnes4 Using WFP rations at 0.4 kilogrammes cereal, 60 grammes
pulses, 20 grammes oil and 5 grammes of salt per person per day
4.
CEAS has already distributed 5 tonnes of locally purchased sorghum seeds
and more seeds are being sourced locally for distribution with locally
made tools as part of the on-going food security programme.
Personnel and incentives, mainly for casual labourers, will be needed as
well as stationary and transport costs (both internal and external).
The timeframe set for implementation of the planned intervention is three
months, starting at the beginning of August 2002. Sorghum can be purchased
locally from Jerdan and Jorot Payams, which produced a surplus in 2001.
Pulses will be purchased in Kenya. 9 tonnes of cooking oil, left over from
a previous ACT supported emergency appeal for northern Bahr el Ghazal, is
already available in Lokichoggio. The programme will be preceded by an
initial period of about one week (Nairobi and Lokichoggio) during which
tender documents will be prepared, orders placed and logistics
arrangements concluded. This will be followed by one week of mobilisation
and orientation of collaborating staff in the field.
Implementation Description per Activity
CEAS already has a considerable amount of experience and expertise in this
field, gained through the implementation of similar exercises in the same
area. This, plus the presence and availability of manpower and equipment,
make the successful realisation of the objectives of the project fully
achievable. The CEAS Programme Manager (with prior experience in emergency
operations at CRS and UNICEF) will facilitate implementation of planned
activities. Other CEAS field staff in Southern Blue Nile will assist him,
as will members of the Emergency Committee made up of the NGOs mentioned
above, together with staff of ROOF and the SRRA. .
All persons involved in planned operations already work in the area so air
travel costs in and out of the region will not be required.
Other transport costs will comprise fuel costs for two 4x4 vehicles and
two tractors and possibly for hire of additional trucks from the local
authorities.
GOAL, ROOF and the regional authorities (whose senior staff are expected
to give freely of their time, mobilisation skills and perhaps some
miscellaneous assistance, such as on-site radio communications etc.) will
provide in-kind assistance.
ADMINISTRATION, FINANCE, MONITORING & REPORTING
Administration
The CEAS Nairobi office structure is composed of five departments:
Capacity Building;
Field Operations;
Finance;
Monitoring and Evaluation;
Programmes.
All departments are vertical in the sense that each is specialised,
dealing with a single discipline or group of inter-related disciplines.
However, horizontal linkages exist above and below the departmental level.
E.g. at the higher level the five department heads, together with the
Director, constitute the Senior Management Team, while at the lower level
each department relates, according to its own functions, with personnel
and programmes in the field.
The functions of the five departments are as follows:
Capacity Building:
Needs assessment of partner organisations.
Elaboration of programmes of institutional and staff development covering
said organisations and bodies.
Organisation and facilitation of training programmes.
Development of training materials.
Field visits and supervision.
Field Operations:
Personnel management.
Procurement, including preparation of tender dossiers and tender
evaluations.
Transport and logistics, e.g. road haulage, air cargo, air charter,
customs clearance etc.
Communications with the field, e.g. radio, satellite phone etc.
Elaboration and periodic review of Field Ops procedures, including
security procedures, procurement procedures etc.
Field visits and supervision.
Finance:
Finance management, e.g. banking, cash disbursements etc.
Financial control, e.g. supervision of field-based imprest accounts,
preparation of monthly, half-yearly and yearly accounts statements.
Field visits and supervision, including field audit.
Office / compound management functions, including relations with LWF
finance department etc.
Monitoring & Evaluation:
Project planning (in collaboration with Programmes office).
Design and dissemination of suitable reporting formats, including
selection of monitoring indicators.
Training and orientation of field personnel in use of reporting formats.
Editing / compilation of key programme reports (quarterly and annual).
Preparation of annual staff evaluation reports (in collaboration with
Field Ops).
Field visits and supervision.
Programmes:
Project planning (in collaboration with M & E).
Project / programme design (in collaboration with field staff and
partners).
Relations with NSCC and other partner organisations.
Appraisal and selection of projects submitted for consideration by church
bodies and SINGOs.
Field visits and supervision.
Persons responsible for the implementation of the activities described
here will be:
Programmes Co-ordinator * Supervision and follow up.
Finance Co-ordinator * Budget control.
Monitoring and Evaluation Co-ordinator * Co-ordination with donors and
reporting.
Finance
In the period since CEAS came into existence in 1996 responsibility for
financial management has been shared between CAFOD of London (the CEAS
"Facilitating Agency) and CEAS itself. Through a decision of the CEAS
Executive Committee in September 2001, this situation is now set to
change, with all finance management functions transferred from London to
Nairobi by September 2002, the end of the CEAS financial year. At this
point CAFOD will assume an advisory role leaving all issues of management
and accountability to CEAS alone.
To assist the donors, CEAS continues to receive funds through a bank
account in London that is supervised by CAFOD. The finance system in use
in Nairobi is imbued with various checks and balances and no transactions
are possible without the participation and collaboration of at least two
individuals, e.g. for requisition and authorisation / joint account
signatories etc.
The two persons currently responsible for finance management are the
Director and the Finance Co-ordinator, both LWF contracted international
staff.
Monitoring
The M & E Co-ordinator will be responsible for donor liaison and reporting
with respect to implementation of the activities described here.
IMPLEMENTATION TIMETABLE
As indicated above, the timetable for implementation of this project is
three months. The project will be implemented in tandem with the
mainstream CEAS development programme for the area, concentrating on food
security, health, education, water and women's activities.
CO-ORDINATION
The current CEAS policy on institution and capacity building has come to
be known as Murafaga (Arabic for accompaniment). Recent experience
indicates that the "Murafaga" methodology can work with relief activities
as well as in pure development situations. This is fortunate because the
CEAS Memorandum of Understanding and the Strategic Plan 2000 * 2005 both
outline a role for CEAS in the emergency and relief sector5 For details
see CEAS Accompaniment Strategy paper of 2001.
5.
This approach has already been successfully put into practice in the
recently completed Northern Bahr el Ghazal Emergency Feeding Programme,
which saw CEAS fund raising for and working with a consortium of other
implementing bodies, including the Catholic Diocese of Rumbek, NCA, CRS
and World Relief.
BUDGET
INCOME RECEIVED:
Description Type of No of Unit Cost Budget
Unit Units US$ US$
In kind contributions:
Balance of commodities from previous appeal (Northern Bahr El Gazhal) ACT
AFSD 14 & CARITAS SOA 31/2001:
Oil MT 9.00 760 6,840
TOTAL INCOME 6,840
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE
Description Type of No of Unit Cost Budget
Unit Units US$ US$
DIRECT ASSISTANCE
Pre-Crisis Assistance
Nutrition assessment Lumpsum 5,979
Food Inputs
Beans MT 32.40 418 13,543
Oil MT 10.80 760 8,208
Salt MT 2.70 140 378
Sub Total 22,129
Agricultural Inputs
Seeds ( to be purchased in Sudan) MT 50.00 250 12,500
Total 34,629
MATERIAL TRANSPORT, STORAGE, WAREHOUSING & HANDLING
Air cargo flights Loki to Yabus MT 45.90 850 39,015
Road transport costs (Nbi/Loki) MT 36.90 64 2,362
Truck rental and related costs Days 45 100 4,500
Passenger flights (Nbi/Loki/Nbi) Trip 4 372 1,488
Charter flights Flight 1 4,000 4,000
Fees loading & unloading, security, cleaning etc MT 91.80 60 5,508
Storage charges in Lokichoggio Month 2 250 500
Total 57,373
PERSONNEL, ADMINISTRATION, OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT
Staff Salaries and Support
Program manager (at 33.3% of base salary) Month 3 464 1,392
Program administrator (at 50% of base salary) Month 3 507 1,521
Agricultural officer (at 25% of base salary) Month 3 261 783
Director (at 10% of base salary) Month 3 450 1,350
Finance coordinator (at 20% of base salary) Month 3 800 2,400
Program coordinator (at 25% of base salary) Month 3 560 1,680
Monitoring & evaluation (at 25% of base salary) Month 3 484 1,452
Field operations (at 25% of base salary) Month 3 484 1,452
Deputy field operations coordinator (@ 25% ) Month 3 348 1,044
Office Operations
Telephones Month 3 200 600
Stationery Month 3 250 750
Vehicle Operation
Diesel fuel Liter 1,000 1 615
Vehicle hire (including driver & maintenance) Day 90 50 4,500
Total 19,539
AUDIT
Audit fees Lumpsum 1,200
TOTAL EXPENDITURE 118,720
Less Income 6,840
BALANCE REQUESTED 111,880
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Action by Churches Together (ACT) is a worldwide alliance of churches and
their related agencies, meeting human need through co-ordinated emergency
response. The ACT Coordinating Office is based with the World Council of
Churches (WCC) and the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) in Switzerland.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ecumenical Centre Phone: ++41-22-791.60.33
150, route de Ferney Fax: ++41-22-791.65.06
P.O. Box 2100 E-Mail: act@wcc-coe.org
1211 Geneva 2 Telex: 415 730 OIK CH
Switzerland http://www.act-intl.org
distributed by
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Center for International Disaster Information
Volunteers in Technical Assistance
web: www.cidi.org
listserv: www.cidi.org/listsub.htm
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
comments/suggestions/requests to incident@cidi.org