Sudan - ACT: 01-Nov-02
Action by Churches Together (ACT)
Appeal - Sudan
Assistance to IDPs in Western Equatoria - Sudan AFSD-24
Appeal Target: US$ 242,086
Geneva, 1 November 2002
The Internally Displaced People in the camps of Mabia in Mupoi and Baikpa
in Ezo in the Western Equatorial Region in southern Sudan have been facing
hardships since being relocated to the camps around October 2001 after
they fled fighting between the SPLA and the Sudan government army in the
town of Raga, in Western Bahr el Ghazal. Over 57,000 were displaced and
have been living in what has been described 'very severe and desperate
conditions' by the Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Rumbek in south
Sudan.
CARE international and UNICEF has been the only organisations providing
basic services to the IDPs in the two camps. But in an assessment carried
out by the Church Ecumenical Action in Sudan (CEAS) in July 2002 to assess
conditions of the IDPs in the two camps, it become apparent that the
people were seriously lacking basic needs such as water, medical
facilities, shelter, and food. CEAS therefore, proposes to take part in
the assistance of the IDPs in the sectors of water, health, education,
shelter, and food security through the provision of tools and seeds. This
appeal describes clearly how CEAS will carry out their intervention in
this program through its members, the Catholic Diocese of Tambura/Yambio,
and the Episcopal Church of Sudan, diocese of Ezo.
Project Completion Date: 28 February 2003
Summary of Appeal Targets, Pledges/Contributions Received and Balance
Requested
US$
Total Appeal Target(s) 242,086
Less: Pledges/Contr. Recd. 0
Balance Requested from ACT Network 242,086
Ms. Genevieve Jacques Thor-Arne Prois Robert Granke
Director Director, ACT Director
WCC/Cluster on Relations LWF/World Service
REQUESTING ACT MEMBER INFORMATION
Church Ecumenical Action in Sudan (CEAS)
IMPLEMENTING ACT MEMBER & PARTNER INFORMATION
Church Ecumenical Action in Sudan (CEAS), formed in 1996, is an ecumenical
consortium made up of three international Christian networks (Caritas
Internationalis, Lutheran World Federation and World Council of Churches)
and the two Sudanese Church Councils (Sudan Council of Churches and the
New Sudan Council of Churches).
By virtue of its mandate and composition, CEAS always works in partnership
with other organisations, both local and international. These include
generalised church development agencies, individual church dioceses,
international faith-based NGOs and Sudanese indigenous NGOs (SINGOs).
In the intervention presented here, CEAS' partners comprise the Catholic
Diocese of Tambura/Yambio, the Episcopal Church of Sudan, Diocese of Ezo,
Wau Organisation for Rehabilitation and Development (WORD) and the local
authorities of Tambura and Ezo Counties.
The Catholic Diocese of Tambura/Yambio: The Catholic Diocese of
Tambura/Yambio (TYD) has been in existence since 1974. It has its
headquarters in Yambio, due to the central location of the town.
In the late 1990s, in collaboration and partnership with Catholic Relief
Service (CRS), TYD started a process of sustainable institutional capacity
development interventions that gave birth to a diocesan Strategic Plan
covering the period 1999-2003. Four programme areas emerged from this
plan: pastoral, education, health and water and women in development.
Regrettably, the ongoing war has impeded most efforts to develop the
organisational and operational capacity of the diocese to serve the local
population. CEAS therefore intends to use the opportunity presented by
this intervention to strengthen the capacity of the diocese to respond to
future emergency situations.
The Episcopal Church of Sudan, Diocese of Ezo: the Diocese of Ezo is one
of the smaller dioceses among the 24 ECS dioceses found in Sudan, as a
consequence of which diocesan structures are very rudimentary.
Wau Organisation for Rehabilitation and Development (WORD): WORD is an
indigenous NGO (or SINGO) formed in March 2001 by the community in Western
Bahr el Ghazal in response to the widespread displacement prevalent
throughout the area.
The WORD organisational structure comprises a Board of Directors who are
responsible for policy development, and a secretariat made up of a
Programme Co-ordinator, Programme Officer, Finance Officer and secretary
(based in a co-ordination office in Nairobi) and Health, Education,
Agriculture and Women's Development Officers (based in the field).
WORD was formed with the express objective of providing services to IDPs
from the Wau area currently displaced to Mabia and other locations. The
organisation's mission statement indicates that it will seek to improve
coping mechanisms among the displaced population while its specific
objectives include:
promotion of peace and respect for human rights through conflict
resolution;
promotion of agriculture through distribution of seed and tools;
promotion of education through rehabilitation of schools and
promotion of health through provision of primary health care services.
WORD also wishes to support women's development through promotion of small
enterprise, credit and adult education.
The Local Authorities in Tambura and Ezo and the Sudan Relief and
Rehabilitation Association (SRRA): Equatoria is one of the five disputed
regions that make up the area controlled by the Sudan People's Liberation
Army (SPLA). Located in the south west of the country on the borders with
the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda,
the province of Western Equatoria is administered through a hierarchy of
administrative positions starting with the Regional Secretary or Governor
and encompassing various local level leaders including County and Payam
Secretaries.
The local authorities have been involved in conducting needs assessments
and constitute a critical element in the planned emergency intervention,
providing local knowledge, access and security.
The SRRA is the humanitarian wing of the SPLM/SPLA which is, thus,
mandated to co-ordinate the relief, rehabilitation and development
activities of organisations working in the area.
Other organisations operating in the area include:
CARE: At the onset of the emergency in Tambura (and later in Ezo) in
November/December 2001, a number of international organisations responded
to the crisis. CARE took the leading role in emergency operations in terms
of sectors as well as in the volume of relief aid provided. However, CARE
could not meet all needs of the IDP population and hence the planned
CEAS/Church intervention presented here. This fact notwithstanding, only
CARE and International Medical Corps (IMC) have a permanent presence in
the area, although on a smaller scale than in previous years.
CRS: Played some role in the initial emergency, although on a limited
scale. Based on the needs assessment conducted by CEAS and NSCC in July
2002, CRS has written a proposal whose goal is to provide access to safe,
sustainable water and sanitation facilities to the IDP population of Ezo1
CRS proposal document, August, 2002
1.
DESCRIPTION of the EMERGENCY SITUATION
Background
On 2 June 2001 the SPLA captured the town of Raga in Western Bahr el
Ghazal from the Government of Sudan. In October 2001 the town was
recaptured by the Sudan Army, causing the displacement of an estimated
57,000 people who were (as described by the Catholic Bishop of the Diocese
of Rumbek) in a "very desperate" situation.
This population, which consisted mainly of women and children, fled south
for safety and walked a distance of approximately 300kms under very harsh
conditions. They were received at Namutina Camp in Western Equatoria
Province and thereafter transferred by CARE and UNICEF to Mabia Camp near
the town of Mupoi in Western Equatoria where they are settled to date.
A rapid needs assessment was conducted by several organisations, including
a joint CEAS/NSCC team, in December 2001. This assessment pre-empted but
was later superseded by the emergency response of other locally-based
NGOs, primarily CARE, who provided assistance to an estimated 20,000
internally displaced people.
In this respect, CARE provided basic health care and health education and
sensitisation in conjunction with UNICEF, supplementary feeding in
collaboration with WFP, distribution of IDP kits, with contributions from
CRS and MEDAIR, and undertook basic repairs to roads.
In a separate and unrelated occurrence, in February 2002, an influx of
about 4,000 refugees and returnees from the Democratic Republic of Congo
(DRC) arrived in Ezo, a small town on the border between Western Equatoria
and DRC. The cause of the displacement was a dispute between a local
spiritual leader and the community. These refugees and returnees were
settled in Baikpa Camp. The numbers have since increased to approximately
6,000 according to the CEAS/NSCC assessment of July 2002.
This population also received rapid emergency assistance from CARE, which
(as in the case of Mabia) was not geared toward addressing long-term
needs. The refugees precarious situation was further complicated by the
absence of NGOs and UN agencies able to provide services to this specific
population due to lack of a mandate to support refugees among the UN
agencies operating in south Sudan. This process is still on going with
little progress made to date.
Accordingly, in both camps there are unmet, basic needs, such as the need
for seeds and tools for agricultural self-reliance2 The USAID Famine Early
Warning System (FEWS) report of July 2002 informs us that although the
harvest in Western Equatorial was generally good this year (as a
consequence of which WFP reduced food rations by 50%) the IDPs were
"largely constrained by lack of access to sufficient seeds".
2 and education for school age children.
Current Emergency Situation
Six months after the IDPs arrived in the camps of Mabia in Mupoi and
Baikpa in Ezo, the Catholic Bishop of Tambura/Yambio and the ECS Bishop of
Ezo reported respectively an inadequate provision of assistance for those
affected. This prompted CEAS (in the person of the organisations' Medical
Co-ordinator) and NSCC (in the form of its Chairperson, also the parish
priest in Mupoi) to undertake a new assessment of the situation, towards
the beginning of July 2002.
The assessment comprised interviews with key informants, notably the SRRA,
chiefs and community leaders and the IDPs themselves, observations and
random mid-upper arm circumference measurements of 201 children aged
between 6-59 months in Mabia and 50 children in Baikpa.
The assessment was difficult to implement due to lack of transport (the
only vehicle available being that of the Catholic Bishop), heavy rains
that occurred during the assessment and other rain related logistical
difficulties.
The assessment in Mabia Camp revealed the need for urgent intervention in
the following areas:
Water
Of the 10 bore holes drilled by UNICEF earlier in the year, 6 are
functioning but with insufficient water. This problem is likely to worsen
during the dry season between November and March3 The TYD had prepared its
current annual budget for activities in water provision before the arrival
of the IDPs, who are now using water from Mabia seasonal stream, which is
not potable.
3.
Health
There are no medical doctors in the area. However, there are 4 medical
assistants and 4 trained traditional birth attendants.
Insufficient and inappropriate drugs have been provided.
There is no laboratory nor equipment such as microscopes, although there
are 2 trained laboratory technicians4 Apparently there was an equipped
laboratory at Namutina Reception Camp, where the IDPs were initially
received.
4.
Major illnesses in the camp comprise:
Malaria/fever
Diarrhoeal diseases
Respiratory tract infection
Scabies
Sleeping sickness (there are a lot of tsetse flies in the area).
Education
According to the school co-ordinator for TYD there are 878 children going
to both primary and secondary school. The information gathered during the
assessment indicates that there are more than 3,000 children in Mabia
Camp, which would appear low as a percentage of a total population of over
20,000.
Assistance provided to date includes the following:
UNICEF provided 10 emergency schools in the form of small tents. Five of
these tents have been destroyed by the wind. Repairs are in process but
the tents are too small for the number of pupils concerned.
School kits (exercise books, pens, chalk, chalk boards) were provided by
UNICEF but were insufficient in number.
There are 27 Arabic trained teachers. CARE took these teachers to Tambura
for a 12 days English course. The course was too short (as reported by
local leaders). There is need for future frequent short courses.
There is no water at the school. UNICEF drilled up to 90 meters but didn't
hit the water table.
Lack of toilets, forcing the pupils to use the surrounding bush. (The
assessment team suggested that the community should bury faeces in shallow
holes as a temporary measure but there is lack of digging tools).
No textbooks have been provided. UNICEF representatives informed the
assessment team that all school kits are issued at the beginning of the
year. A projection proposal for text books for primary 1 - 3 and teacher
guides for every teacher (for Maths, English and Science) has been
submitted for the coming year, but there is no guarantee that they will be
provided.
Shelter
Each family was allocated and settled in a 20 x 40 meter plot. Most of the
IDPs have since built grass thatched, mud huts. When grass was not
available, plastic sheeting was used for roofing. Most of the plastic
sheeting is now torn from the heat of the sun. The IDPs are in need of
more plastic sheeting and other non-food items such as blankets, mosquito
nets, cooking pots, plates, cups, spoons, basins, buckets, water jerry
cans. Some assistance of this kind was made available by the Church
during the course of the year, but in insufficient amounts.
Food
WFP has been supplying food, although no salt has been given. The Church
has also provided a small amount.
Lentils have been given but the community prefer beans and groundnuts.
They have been selling personal belongings to buy salt and other essential
items. If they had fishing hooks/nets they could fish in the local
streams.
UNICEF gave one grinding mill for food processing but, being alone, it
breaks down often. If two more grinding mills were obtained they would
more effectively serve the IDP population.
Tools
Most of the residential plots have been cultivated and planted with
groundnuts, okra, sweet potatoes and tomatoes. The IDPs do not have enough
tools to produce enough food for their families. The few tools that were
distributed are shared between families. There is also a need for
carpentry tools.
Seeds
Bigger plots of land have been cleared (see sketch) but the community
lacks seeds. The following seeds are required:
Maize.
Ground nuts.
Sorghum.
Assorted vegetable seeds.
There are two seasons, March and August.
Other Needs
Other items that may prove beneficial include:
Sewing machines for the women group.
Bicycles to facilitate the movements of teachers/leaders to and from
Tambura.
Wheelbarrows.
Old/used clothes for the destitute.
The population also expressed a need to have a consumer co-operative from
which they could purchase essential items. The camp is 16 Kms from Tambura
where the main shops are located.
Baikpa: The assessment of the current situation in Baikpa revealed a
broadly similar pattern of needs, although with particular emphasis on the
need for clean water and health services.
As with Mabia, agricultural self-sufficiency is the key to survival in the
future.
Impact on Human Lives
The random MUAC measurements of children aged 6 months to 59 months of whom 110 were male and 91 female revealed the following results:
171 MUAC greater than 12.5 + (adequately nourished).
24 MUAC 11.0 to less than 12.5 (moderate malnutrition).
6 MUAC less than 11.0 cm (severe malnutrition).
No additional malnutrition was observed, although there were 43 children
with MUAC 13 - 13.5 cm, which indicates that nutritional status was not
good. As it was a rapid assessment, Global Malnutrition was not determined
as this would have required weight for height measurements as well.
88 children out of the 201 in the sample were found to be sick with
diarrhoea, malaria, fever, scabies and wounds. Although only six children
were found to be severely malnourished, while 24 out of the sample of 201
were moderately malnourished, the prevalence of sick children in the camps
is likely to result in increased levels of malnutrition. An adequate
supply of essential drugs for the children is therefore required without
delay.
However, even in this situation of dire need, the assessment team observed
that homesteads were generally well kept. 75% of the homesteads had pit
latrines and bathing areas.
Locations for Proposed Response
Mapia Camp in Tambura County and Baikpa in Ezo County.
Current Security Situation
Generally, the Tambura/Yambio area has enjoyed a long period of peace,
which has enabled NGOs to work in the area - and the IDPs to stay in the
area - without interruption due to insecurity.
GOAL & OBJECTIVES
Goal: To provide humanitarian emergency aid in the area of water and
sanitation, provision of displaced persons kits, seeds and tools and
training for existing teachers in the use of the English language.
Objectives:
For Mabia camp:
Training of pump technicians in the management of water points.
Improved hygiene and sanitation through provision of digging tools for pit
latrines.
Provision of displaced persons kits comprising basic items such as
blankets, mosquito nets, utensils, cooking pots, soap and salt.
Distribution of seeds and tools to enhance food security and nutrition.
Provision of English language training for teachers.
In the course of the intervention, training of diocesan staff in emergency
relief management.
For Baikpa:
Provision of displaced persons kits comprising basic items such as
blankets, mosquito nets, utensils, cooking pots, soap and salt.
Distribution of seeds and tools to enhance food security and nutrition.
Provision of English language training for teachers.
In the course of the intervention, training of diocesan staff in emergency
relief management.
TARGETED BENEFICIARIES
The IDPs from Raga were first received in the transit camp at Namutina in
November / December 2001 where they received aid from CARE. In January
2002, UNICEF transferred the IDPs to their current location in Mabia Camp.
The population is estimated to be 4,891 households as indicated below:
TRIBE
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
1.
Kresh
896
2
Balanda of Dem Zubair
755
3
Balanda of Raja
570
4
Chad
683
5
Yulu
483
6
Zande of Dem Zubair
398
7
Mangayat
310
8
Banda
497
9
Ajaa
299
TOTAL
4,891
Average number of people per household is 5, therefore the estimated
population is 24,455.
The population in Baikpa camp is estimated to be 6,079 made up of 1,216
households.
Criteria Used in Beneficiary Selection and Number of Targeted
Beneficiaries Because of the generalised nature of needs (IDP kits;
agricultural inputs; teacher training; medicines and PHC supplies) in the
two locations the assistance to be provided will serve the entire
population of 24,455 (Mabia) and 6,079 (Baikpa) respectively.
Distribution of emergency inputs will be managed by the Church and / or
SINGOs such as WORD (with assistance from the civil authorities in the
form of organisation).
PROPOSED EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE & IMPLEMENTATION
The nature of the assistance to be provided is consistent with the nature
of the problems and needs noted above.
A total of 500 IDP kits will be purchased to cater for the needs of the
approximately 6,000 households affected. This figure takes into
consideration the kits issued earlier in the year by CARE and a number of
other donors.
Second hand clothing will also be procured to meet the needs of the
estimated 5,000 young children living in the two camps. Second hand
clothing is also required for other vulnerable groups.
With respect to health care, standard primary health care drug kits will
be purchased to meet the needs of the two populations for a period of six
months. This will comprise drugs for an estimated 25,000 people in Mabia,
which is an isolated area with a small native population, and an estimated
7,500 people in Baikpa, which has a substantial indigenous population.
Given that a standard PHC kit is designed to meet the needs of
approximately 5,000 people for one month, Mabia will need 5 (five) kits
per month, or 30 (thirty) kits over a six month period. Baikpa will need
one and a half kits per month or 9 (nine) kits over the six month period.
A contingency of 6 (six) kits will then be added to cater for unforeseen
eventualities, making an overall total of 45 kits.
To ensure proper usage of the drugs provided a small incentive will be
made available for each of seven qualified health workers. These health
staff will be paid and supervised through WORD and the two dioceses.
Also in the interests of improved health, training will be provided to two
teams of three water point technicians, in pump maintenance. Digging tools
will also be provided in order to expedite the digging of pit latrines.
To promote long term food self reliance, seed and tools will be provided
for 6,000 households. Items supplied will include:
Two hand hoes per household;
10 kgs bean seed per household;
10 kgs maize seed per household;
Cassava cuttings;
Okra, tomato and onion vegetable seed.
English language training courses for primary teachers will be conducted
in Mupoi and Ezo for teachers from the two communities. Each course will
last for a period of one month and will involve up to 20 teachers per
location. To promote better communication and administration, a total of
30 bicycles will be purchased for distribution among the chiefs, health
workers and teachers. A quantity of building materials will also be bought
for the rehabilitation of local structures.
Implementation Description per Activity
As noted above, planned activities are to be undertaken by a number of
organisations including CEAS itself. Specifically, CEAS will manage both
the funds generated and the logistics, e.g., procurement, transport,
co-ordination, monitoring, report writing and submission, for the planned
intervention.
Activities on the ground will be implemented by WORD and the two church
dioceses, who are included among the beneficiaries of the programme
because they are expected to benefit from the experience gained during
project implementation.
ADMINISTRATION, FINANCE, MONITORING & REPORTING
Administration
The CEAS Nairobi office structure is composed of five departments:-
Capacity Building; Field Operations; Finance; Monitoring & Evaluation and
Programmes.
All departments are vertical in the sense that each is specialised,
dealing with a single discipline or group of inter-related disciplines.
However, horizontal linkages exist above and below the departmental level.
E.g. at the higher level the five department heads, together with the
Director, constitute the Senior Management Team, while at the lower level
each department relates, according to its own functions, with personnel
and programmes in the field.
The functions of the five departments are as follows:
Capacity Building:
Needs assessment of partner organisations.
Elaboration of programmes of institutional and staff development covering
said organisations and bodies.
Organisation and facilitation of training programmes.
Development of training materials.
Field visits and supervision.
Field Operations:
Personnel management.
Procurement, including preparation of tender dossiers and tender
evaluations.
Transport and logistics, e.g. road haulage, air cargo, air charter,
customs clearance etc.
Communications with the field, e.g. radio, satellite phone etc.
Elaboration and periodic review of Field Ops procedures, including
security procedures, procurement procedures etc.
Field visits and supervision.
Finance:
Finance management, e.g. banking, cash disbursements etc.
Financial control, e.g. supervision of field-based imprest accounts,
preparation of monthly, half-yearly and yearly accounts statements.
Field visits and supervision, including field audit.
Office / compound management functions, including relations with LWF
finance department etc.
Monitoring & Evaluation:
Project planning (in collaboration with Programmes office).
Design and dissemination of suitable reporting formats, including
selection of monitoring indicators.
Training and orientation of field personnel in use of reporting formats.
Editing / compilation of key programme reports (quarterly and annual).
Preparation of annual staff evaluation reports (in collaboration with
Field Ops).
Field visits and supervision.
Programmes:
Project planning (in collaboration with M & E).
Project / programme design (in collaboration with field staff and
partners).
Relations with NSCC and other partner organisations.
Appraisal and selection of projects submitted for consideration by church
bodies and SINGOs.
Field visits and supervision.
Persons responsible for the implementation of the activities described
here will be:
Programmes Co-ordinator - supervision and follow up.
Finance Co-ordinator - budget control.
Monitoring and Evaluation Co-ordinator - co-ordination with donors and
reporting.
Finance Management and Controls
In the period from1996, when CEAS came into existence, until 2001,
responsibility for financial management was shared between CAFOD of London
(the CEAS "Facilitating Agency) and CEAS itself. Through a decision of the
CEAS Executive Committee in September 2001, this situation has now changed
with all finance management functions transferred from London to Nairobi
in the financial year October 2001 to September 2002. Accordingly, CAFOD
now performs only an advisory role, leaving all issues of management and
accountability to CEAS alone.
To assist the donors, CEAS continues to receive funds through a bank
account in London that is supervised by CAFOD. The finance system in use
in Nairobi is imbued with various checks and balances and no transactions
are possible without the participation and collaboration of at least two
individuals, e.g. for requisition and authorisation / joint account
signatories etc.
The two persons currently responsible for finance management are the
Director and the Finance Co-ordinator, both LWF contracted international
staff.
Monitoring
The M & E Co-ordinator is responsible for donor liaison and reporting with
respect to implementation of the activities described here.
IMPLEMENTATION TIMETABLE
As indicated above, the timetable for implementation of this project is
three months. The project will be implemented in tandem with the
mainstream CEAS development programme in southern Sudan, concentrating on
food security, health, education, water and women's activities.
CO-ORDINATION
The current CEAS policy on institution and capacity building has come to
be known as Murafaga (Arabic for accompaniment). Recent experience
indicates that the "Murafaga" methodology can work with relief activities
as well as in pure development situations. This is fortunate because the
CEAS Memorandum of Understanding and the Strategic Plan 2000 - 2005 both
outline a role for CEAS in the emergency and relief sector5 For details
see CEAS Accompaniment Strategy paper of 2001.
5.
This approach has already been successfully put into practice in the
recently completed Northern Bahr el Ghazal Emergency Feeding Programme,
which saw CEAS fund raising for and working with a consortium of other
implementing bodies, including the Catholic Diocese of Rumbek, NCA, CRS
and World Relief.
BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE
Description Type of No of Unit Cost Budget
Unit Units US$ US$
DIRECT ASSISTANCE
Shelter Rehabilitation and Construction
IDP kits Kits 500 46.00 23,000
Second hand clothing Bales 20 109.00 2,180
Building materials assorted lumpsum 10,000
Sub Total 35,180
Water and Sanitation
Training of Pump Mechanics (6) days 12 250.00 3,000
Pump Repair Kits kits 3 400.00 1,200
Digging Tools kits 300 20.00 6,000
Sub Total 10,200
Description Type of No of Unit Cost Budget
Unit Units US$ US$
Health and Medical Inputs
PHC kits kits 35 281.00 9,835
Sub Total 9,835
Food Security and Agriculture
Maize seed MT 60 500.00 30,000
Bean seed MT 60 500.00 30,000
Cassava cuttings Lorry (loads) 2 1,000.00 2,000
Vegetable seed kgs 3250 5.47 17,778
Hoes Pcs 12,000 3.00 36,000
Sub Total 115,778
Community Infrastructure
Bicycles Pcs 30 80.00 2,400
Sub Total 2,400
Educational Inputs
Teacher training Persons 40 100.00 4,000
Sub Total 4,000
MATERIAL TRANSPORT, STORAGE, WAREHOUSING & HANDLING
Truck Rental and Related Costs at the site Days 30 100 3,000
Road transport Nairobi to Tambura MT 45 550 24,750
Passenger flights flights 6 840.00 5,040
Staff Travel Costs days 54 15.00 810
Warehouse Repair, Construction lumpsum 5,000
Loading & unloading, security, cleaning etc. MT 105 60.00 6,300
Storage charges in Lokichoggio Month 2 250.00 500
Sub Total 45,400
PERSONNEL, ADMINISTRATION, OPERATIONS & SUPPORT
Staff Salaries and Support
WORD Co-ordinator (50%) Mths 3 320.00 960
WORD Prog. Officer (50%) Mths 3 260.00 780
WORD Field Co-ordinator (100%) Mths 3 100.00 300
WORD Agriculture Officer (100%) Mths 3 250.00 750
WORD Education Coordinator (100%)h Mths 3 250.00 750
Medical Assistant 2 Mths 6 150.00 900
Nurses (2) Mths 6 150.00 900
Midwives (2) Mths 6 120.00 720
Health Auxilliaries (2) Mths 6 100.00 600
CEAS Director (10%) Mths 3 450.00 1,350
Finance Co-ordinator (10%) Mths 3 400.00 1,200
Programmes Co-ordinator (10%) Mths 3 224.00 672
M & E Co-ordinator (10%) Mths 3 194.00 582
Field Ops Co-ordinator (10%) Mths 3 194.00 582
Medical Coordinator (10%) Mths 3 194.00 582
Office Operations:
Telephone Month 3 200.00 600
Stationery Month 3 250.00 750
Description Type of No of Unit Cost Budget
Unit Units US$ US$
Vehicle Operation:
Diesel fuel litres 1000 0.62 615
Vehicle Hire (including driver& maintenance) Days 90 50.00 4,500
Training:
Training of Diocesan Staff days 12 200.00 2,400
Sub total 18,093
Audit Fees Lumpsum 1,200
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE 242,086
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Action by Churches Together (ACT) is a worldwide alliance of churches and
their related agencies, meeting human need through co-ordinated emergency
response. The ACT Coordinating Office is based with the World Council of
Churches (WCC) and the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) in Switzerland.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ecumenical Centre Phone: ++41-22-791.60.33
150, route de Ferney Fax: ++41-22-791.65.06
P.O. Box 2100 E-Mail: act@wcc-coe.org
1211 Geneva 2 Telex: 415 730 OIK CH
Switzerland http://www.act-intl.org
distributed by
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Center for International Disaster Information
Volunteers in Technical Assistance
web: www.cidi.org
listserv: www.cidi.org/listsub.htm
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
comments/suggestions/requests to incident@cidi.org